# AI Draft Human Review Record

Document the substantive human checks, corrections, additions, source decisions, disclosures, and publication judgment applied to an AI-assisted draft.

## Usage note

Review from the approved sources and intended reader outcome, not from the generated draft alone. A named human reviewer must have authority, time, and relevant expertise to reject the output.

## How to use this template

1. Link the exact AI draft, provenance, approved brief, source set, and review version.
2. Evaluate usefulness, evidence, omissions, claims, voice, rights, safety, and audience fit.
3. Record every material human addition, correction, rejection, and escalation with a reason.
4. Reconcile the final candidate with sources and required disclosure or attribution.
5. Approve, return, or reject a named version and preserve the accountable review record.

## Blank template

### Draft and reviewer

- **Project and asset ID:** [Enter]
- **AI draft version and location:** [Enter]
- **Provenance and prompt record:** [Enter]
- **Approved brief and source packet:** [Enter]
- **Intended reader and outcome:** [Describe]
- **Reviewer name, role, and expertise:** [Enter]
- **Review date and final candidate version:** [Enter]
- **Risk tier and required specialists:** [Enter]

### Review findings

- [ ] The draft directly serves the approved reader task.
- [ ] Every material factual claim is supported by opened, current evidence.
- [ ] Names, quotations, figures, dates, links, and product behavior were checked.
- [ ] Required limitations, uncertainty, counterevidence, and context are present.
- [ ] No invented authority, source, personal experience, or guarantee remains.
- [ ] Voice, terminology, representation, and accessibility fit the audience.
- [ ] Rights, privacy, sensitive information, and disclosure requirements were reviewed.
- **Important omission:** [Describe or None]
- **Expert escalation:** [Question, owner, decision]

### Material decision log

Duplicate for each significant change.

- **Draft section or claim:** [Enter]
- **Decision:** [Accept / Rewrite / Add / Remove / Escalate]
- **Reason:** [Evidence / Accuracy / Scope / Voice / Rights / Safety / Other]
- **Source or policy used:** [Reference]
- **Human contribution:** [Describe the substantive change]
- **Decision owner:** [Name/date]
- **Verified in final version:** [Yes / No]

### Approval

- **Unresolved issues:** [List or None]
- **Disclosure decision and text:** [Enter]
- **Attribution and source links:** [Confirmed / Changes needed]
- **Final comparison completed:** [Yes / No]
- **Decision:** [Approve / Approve with named condition / Return / Reject]
- **Approver and version:** [Name/version/date]
- **Retention and access:** [Enter]
- **Reopen trigger:** [Material edit, new source, product change, incident]