Audience and Message Research

Jobs-to-Be-Done Content Interview

Investigate the progress readers seek when they find, choose, use, abandon, return to, or share content during a specific decision or task.

Free editable Markdown · Content researchers, product marketers, and content designers · Updated July 30, 2026

Download Markdown

Accessible HTML preview

Blank template

The downloaded file contains the same fields in editable Markdown.

Interview setup

Research decision: [What content choice will this inform?]
Target episode: [Recent search, selection, use, or abandonment]
Participant code: [Non-identifying label]
Relevant experience: [Why this episode fits]
Consent record: [Recording, notes, use, and retention]
Interviewer: [Name]
Interview date: [YYYY-MM-DD]

Timeline prompts

Before: What was happening before you thought about finding this information?
First thought: When did you first feel the old situation was not enough?
Trigger: What made you act at that particular time?
Search: Where did you look, and which words did you use?
Consideration set: What other sources or options did you compare?
Choice: What made you open, trust, save, or use this item?
Use: Walk me through what you did with the content.
Outcome: What changed afterward?
Later behavior: Did you return, adapt, share, or replace it?

Switching forces

Push of old situation: [Frustration, risk, delay, or unmet need]
Pull of new option: [Expected value]
Anxiety about change: [Doubt, cost, trust, or uncertainty]
Habit or inertia: [What favored doing nothing or using the old source]
Decisive evidence: [Cue that shifted the balance]
Rejected alternative: [Why another option lost]

Each force is connected to an event or participant statement.
The interviewer did not supply the desired benefit.
Contradictory evidence is retained.

Synthesis

Progress sought: [Functional, social, or emotional dimensions supported by evidence]
Draft job statement: When [situation], I want to [progress], so I can [meaningful outcome].
Content role: [Trigger / Orient / Compare / Instruct / Reassure / Prove / Record / Handoff]
Success signal: [How the participant knew progress occurred]
Remaining struggle: [What content did not solve]
Design implication: [Information, order, proof, format, or access change]
Confidence and gap: [Strength of pattern and next research]

How to use this template

Recruit participants who recently made the relevant content choice or attempted the target task.
Define a neutral opening that names the episode without naming the outcome you hope to hear.
Reconstruct the timeline from first thought through search, comparison, use, result, and later reuse or abandonment.
Probe the push, pull, anxiety, and habit forces with examples from the episode rather than abstract ratings.
Summarize the progress, content role, unresolved need, and evidence, then compare patterns across interviews.

Reconstruct the timeline

Ask about a specific episode, beginning before the participant searched or opened the content. Identify the first thought that made the old situation feel inadequate, the event that made action urgent, and what else competed for attention. Follow the participant through discovery, comparison, use, interruption, sharing, and outcome. Dates, places, devices, and sequence can help memory without requiring sensitive detail. When someone says “I always,” return gently to “What happened this time?” The objective is a credible timeline, not a perfect story. Note gaps and contradictions as research data rather than repairing them for the participant.

Explore the forces around a choice

Four forces often shape a switch: dissatisfaction with the current situation, attraction to a possible solution, anxiety about change, and habits that preserve the status quo. Ask what made action necessary, what looked promising, what created doubt, and what nearly stopped the participant. Content may itself be the chosen solution, or it may reduce uncertainty around another decision. Do not assume the publisher’s preferred benefit drove selection. Convenience, social reassurance, a familiar example, or the ability to verify a claim may have mattered more than the headline promise.

Distinguish consumption from progress

Opening, reading, or downloading is behavior, not automatically success. Ask what the participant did differently, what decision became possible, what remained unresolved, and whether they returned, saved, adapted, or shared the material. A long read may fail, while one verified sentence may unlock the task. Identify the content’s role and its limits: trigger, orientation, comparison, instruction, reassurance, evidence, record, or handoff. Synthesize several interviews into job statements only after preserving differences. Use resulting insights to change information, sequence, proof, or access—not merely to decorate copy with participant phrases.

See the fields in context

Fictional example: equipment handover guide

Mossline Studio and participant J12 are invented for this template.

Trigger: J12 learned on Friday that they would train a temporary colleague on Monday.
Push: Their handwritten notes were incomplete; the official manual felt too broad for a one-day handover.
Pull: A concise role-specific guide included the startup sequence and common mistakes.
Anxiety: J12 doubted whether the guide reflected the latest equipment update and checked its revision date.
Progress: They created a short training plan; the content acted as orientation and evidence, not a full manual.

Frequently asked questions

Is this just another audience interview?

It uses many good interview practices but focuses tightly on a recent choice and the forces surrounding progress. The timeline and alternatives help reveal why content entered the situation, not only what participants say they prefer.

Must every job include emotional and social dimensions?

No. Include only dimensions supported by evidence. Some tasks are primarily functional; others involve confidence, identity, or how a decision appears to colleagues. Do not invent emotional language to make the model feel complete.

Can we interview people who did not choose our content?

Yes. People who ignored, rejected, abandoned, or replaced it can reveal anxieties, competing options, and mismatched promises. Recruit based on the situation and decision, not only successful customers or enthusiastic readers.

How should job statements be used?

Use them as evidence-backed summaries that guide content requirements, experiments, and prioritization. Keep links to source interviews and variations. A polished statement should not erase different contexts or become an unsupported universal claim.